Jump to Navigation

發表新回應

Proofreaders usually obtain perplexed by the term 'reading against duplicate', so in this article I will try to clarify what the term means.There are two methods which a proofreader may be asked to function: either by reading versus duplicate, or performing a straight (blind) reading.When she is asked to check out versus copy, the proofreader will certainly be supplied with the author's initial typescript (or a copy of this) with the editor's improvements marked on it, and also a set of proofs generated by the typesetter.

https://tryootech.com/online-proofreading-tools/ compares the proofs with the edited typescript, going through both, word by word, line by line, to ensure that the writer's message (along with any content amendments) has actually been faithfully provided, without mistakes presented at the typesetting stage. When doing a straight or blind reading, the proofreader will be supplied with proofs only and also not the original typescript. In this situation, the proofreader can not know whether the original typescript has been properly recreated together with the editor's adjustments. Her duty is simply to check the evidence for web content, increasing any clear mistakes in punctuation, spelling, and so forth, that she might locate. When reading against duplicate, a lot of proofreaders operate by checking a few words of the original typescript, after that checking to see that these show up properly on the proofs, with any kind of content adjustments effectively carried out. Where there is a distinction (if, for instance, an apostrophe has been omitted), the proofreader indicates this with the ideal mark. For every improvement, one mark has to be made in the text itself and an additional in the margin. This is carried out in order to ensure that, when the typesetter involves integrate the proofreader's corrections, he does not unintentionally avoid over any one of them. The expense of 'red' modifications will be borne by the typesetter, while that of 'blue' improvements will certainly be satisfied by the publisher (or, in serious cases, the writer). With a straight reading, of course, you will certainly not recognize whose responsibility any mistakes may be. In this instance, you will certainly mark up all modifications in a single color (generally red). As a freelance proofreader you are most likely to be offered much more straight readings than readings versus copy. This is since the amended typescript is generally returned to the duplicate editor for her to examine against the evidence. The proofreader's function is regarded extra as supplying back-up: a fresh pair of eyes which might identify evident errors neglected by an editor burnt out by over-familiarity. Although the changed typescript can be duplicated and sent to the proofreader too, in practice this is usually really felt by authors to be too much problem. This might not be ideal, however it explains why proofreaders are more likely to be asked to perform a straight reading rather than reviewing against duplicate.



Main menu 2

by Dr. Radut.